Part of the LiveOAK Network

About Us:

We are a new media company publishing websites that focus on energy, the environment and sustainable living. By leading the conversation about green issues, LiveOAK aims to advance the principals of sustainability by making them meaningful and accessible to a mainstream audience.

Editorial: We Were Wrong When We Called IPCC’s Pachauri a Testicle

Feb 11, 2010 by Tree Humper

Everything Else

pachauri_is_not_a_testicle

New analysis shows Pachauri not actually a giant ball with a face.

Not so long ago, the TreeHumper investigative team did some in-depth reporting on the ClimateFence scandal. One of our revelations was that the chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Rajendra Pachauri is actually “one half of a set of anthropomorphized testicles.” Like any good journalist or human being, we can man up to it and say: We were wrong.

Look, the guy’s been through a lot recently. The IPCC has been knocked around so often in the last few months it’s starting to look like Tiger Woods on the wrong end of Elin’s 9-iron. There were the hacked emails, there was a general failure of the UN process in Copenhagen, and then the issues surrounding the on again-off again melting of the Himalayan glaciers. And that’s before we get to Pachauri’s personal issues.

He has been accused of having conflicts of interest because of consulting fees paid out by companies like Toyota, and there have been repeated calls for his resignation. But come on — he published a novel called Return to Almora that is apparently just filled to the brim with crappily written sex. In fact, the main character (an engineer/environmentalist in his 60s—CLEARLY no relation to Pachauri himself) loses his virginity with such bosom-heaving description as when he was “overcome by a lust that he had never known before.” Awesome.

Here’s where the TreeHumper investigators made our mistake: we mistook the fact that he LOVES his testicles with the idea that he IS a testicle. It could happen to anybody, really. So we want to throw our support behind the IPCC chair; lord knows he needs it from SOMEone. We would like to see him stick around for the IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report, which will take a look at all the updated science on global warming and hopefully not fuck up anything too drastically. Watch your decimal places, boys.

So, Rajendra: We’re sorry we called you a testicle. You’re not. Just keep doing what you’re doing, stay strong, balls out.



  • Share:
, , , ,

2 Tweets

3 Responses to “Editorial: We Were Wrong When We Called IPCC’s Pachauri a Testicle”

  1. Hugh Gold Says:

    I really don’t believe it. I pray Wayne is better for the cup!

    Reply

      More from author
  2. treehumper Says:

    Editorial: We Were Wrong When We Called IPCC’s Pachauri a Testicle http://goo.gl/fb/zt2R

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

    Reply

      More from author
  3. davelevitan Says:

    Editorial: We Were Wrong When We Called IPCC’s Pachauri a Testicle http://is.gd/8a6Kh via @TreeHumper

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

    Reply

      More from author

Leave a Reply

Additional comments powered by BackType